Post by account_disabled on Dec 28, 2023 3:11:07 GMT
Athe autonomy of the referral rule in the sense that the appellant explained in support of the first question addressed to the High Court of Cassation and Justice would not automatically lead to the expected consequence. The configuration of the content of the reference rule in case of modification of the reference rule borrowed rule essentially depends on the time of application of the reference rule itself. It is established in relation to the own elements of the reference norm and not to the application of the borrowed norm in time.
Specifically art. para. from Law no. republished with Country Email List subsequent amendments and additions provides first of all the transfer of the ownership right from the states patrimony to the patrimony of the administrativeterritorial unit for intravillage lands that were on the date of entry into force of Law no. owned by the state. This specific element of the rule signifies the fact that the transfer of ownership is a fact generating legal effects therefore a legal situation subject to the law from the moment the fact is produced by virtue of the tempus regit actum factum principle.
This law governs as a rule the effects of the legal situation consequently the legal regime of the lands covered by art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions as an effect of the transfer of the ownership right should also be established on the basis of the law under which the transfer of the ownership right occurred. transmission of the right took place on the date of entry into force of Law no. the application of the rule regulating the legal regime of the land subject to the transfer of rights is justified. In this case the correlation with art. of Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions for the borrowing of.
Specifically art. para. from Law no. republished with Country Email List subsequent amendments and additions provides first of all the transfer of the ownership right from the states patrimony to the patrimony of the administrativeterritorial unit for intravillage lands that were on the date of entry into force of Law no. owned by the state. This specific element of the rule signifies the fact that the transfer of ownership is a fact generating legal effects therefore a legal situation subject to the law from the moment the fact is produced by virtue of the tempus regit actum factum principle.
This law governs as a rule the effects of the legal situation consequently the legal regime of the lands covered by art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions as an effect of the transfer of the ownership right should also be established on the basis of the law under which the transfer of the ownership right occurred. transmission of the right took place on the date of entry into force of Law no. the application of the rule regulating the legal regime of the land subject to the transfer of rights is justified. In this case the correlation with art. of Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions for the borrowing of.